🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to remove Black history and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.