🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.