🔗 Share this article

Transpired the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for using excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later bin them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.