🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about the comments made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz during the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class delivery and powerful power on each front side and reverse side are more than enough to defeat the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, extending the run to the brink of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to use excessive effort to win it. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {